Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Latona

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 2, 2011No. 5D10-3966Published

1DissentPalmer, J.

I respectfully dissent.

Latona filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to rule 3.190(e)(4) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. In State v. Bell, 882 So.2d 468 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), our court explained:

A rule 3.190(c)(4) motion should be granted only when the trial court determines that the most favorable construction of the facts does not establish a prima facie case of guilt; if there is any evidence upon which a reasonable jury could find guilt, a motion to dismiss must be denied.... Moreover, on a motion made pursuant to rule 3.190(c)(4), the State is not only entitled to receive the most…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crawford v. DiMiccoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  2. Stalley v. Transitional Hospitals Corp. of TampaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Kotsch v. KotschDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Dingle v. PrikhdinaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API