Legal Opinion

Lasson v. Seely

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1951No. 7603PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONOUGH, Justice.

Defendant appeals from a judgment and decree whereby he is enjoined from maintaining a dam in a water-course known as Panawats slough, and incidental damages are assessed against him for depriving- plaintiff of water for irrigation purposes. Defendant contends: (1) That he was and is entitled to erect and maintain such a dam; (2) that plaintiff failed to show any actual damage; (3) that defendant was entitled to recover at least nominal damages on his counterclaim for trespass, and also recover costs.

Panawats slough is a water course, the flow of which is in a northerly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smithfield West Bench Irr. Co. v. Union Central Life Ins.Utah Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McNaughton v. EatonUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. East Bench Irr. Co. v. Deseret Irr. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Estate of Steed Ex Rel. Kazan v. New Escalante Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. FAIRFIELD IRRIGATION CO. v. CARSON Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Melville v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API