Legal Opinion
Wade v. Wellpoint, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided August 31, 2012No. 1:08-cv-00357-SEB-DKLPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint [Docket No. 100], filed on November 8, 2010. Plaintiffs motion comes in response to this court’s September 22, 2010 order [Docket No. 99] dismissing the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) without prejudice. At that time, we found that the FAC fell short of the heightened pleading requirements applicable to securities fraud litigation, and we granted Plaintiff forty-five days within which to seek leave to…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Tesla Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Ronald Bullens v. OpenAI L.P., Sam Altman, Affiliated Entities Does 1-25District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2025