Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Lindsay

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided February 29, 1996No. 01-95-00603-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDELL, Justice.

The issue presented by this petition is whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying relators’ motion to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act 1 (FAA).

I. BACKGROUND

The relator, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife), is a mutual insurance company and several of its executives. The real parties in interest are all former Met-Life salesmen (the employees). In their petition, the employees allege that MetLife created a scheme to market life insurance as a “savings plan” or a “retirement plan” without ever mentioning the term “life…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hou-Scape, Inc. v. Lloyd, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  2. In Re The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practice Litigation All Agent ActionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  3. Young v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  4. Wachovia Securities, LLC v. Emery, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  5. In Re Nestle USA-Beverage Division, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API