Legal Opinion
Pacific Selling Co. v. Albright-Prior Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 25, 1907No. 654PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Attachment, from city court of Atlanta- — -Judge Eeid. April 20, 1907.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
The Pacific Selling Company is a non-resident corporation. The plaintiff instituted suit against it and another by attachment. The declaration duly filed alleged a breach of contract of sale. By amendment all allegations as to the other defendant were stricken and the case proceeded against the Pacific Selling Company alone. A judgment having been recovered by the plaintiff, the defendant brings error.
1. The defendant filed a demurrer to the declaration in attachment, on the ground that no cause of action was set forth. This demurrer was overruled and exceptions were duly preserved. It is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Home Insurance v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
- Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Blakely Oil & Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Kelly & Brother v. Kauffman Milling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Selma, Rome & Dalton Railroad v. TysonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
- Cathcart v. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Pless & SladeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Parramore v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Hagedorn v. ZemurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Gulf Life Insurance Co. v. BelchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Wofford Oil Co. v. Strickland Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937