Legal Opinion

Gulf Life Insurance Co. v. Belch

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 12, 1963No. 40223, 40224PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. The court did not err in admitting in evidence testimony showing the contents of the note found in the deceased insured’s automobile. “The execution of a written instrument may be shown by circumstantial . . . evidence.” Fay v. Burton, 147 Ga. 648 (4) (95 SE 224); Proctor & Gamble v. Blakely Oil Co., 128 Ga. 606 (3) (57 SE 879); Campbell v. Sims, 161 Ga. 517 (8), 522 (131 SE 483); Deaderick v. Deaderick, 182 Ga. 96 (1) (185 SE 89); Sharp v. Autry, 185 Ga. 160, 168 (194 SE 194); Fowler v. Latham, 201 Ga. 68, 72 (38 SE2d 732); Wofford Oil Co. v. Strickland Motor Co., 56…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chenall v. Palmer Brick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Kinnebrew v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  3. Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Blakely Oil & Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Templeton v. Kennesaw Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  5. Bryan v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gulf Life Insurance v. BelchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API