Fouste v. Department of Employment
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McQUADE, Chief Justice.
Claimant-appellant, Loretta S. Fouste, (hereinafter claimant) brings this appeal from an order of the Industrial Commission denying her claim for unemployment insurance benefits. We affirm the order of the Industrial Commission.
Claimant was employed as a machinist for Omark, an ammunition manufacturer, in Lewiston, Idaho, for nine years commencing April 14, 1965, and continuing until June 17, 1974, when she terminated her employment. Claimant resided in the Lewiston area during the entire period of her employment, with the exception of the last year when she moved to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- California Department of Human Resources Development v. JavaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Striebeck v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by16 opinions
- Canyon County Bd. of Equalization v. AMALGAMATED SUGAR COMPANY, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Gary v. NicholsDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1978
- Luskin v. Department of EmploymentIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Smith v. Idaho Department of LaborIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Hill v. State, Department of EmploymentIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.