Legal Opinion

Canyon County Bd. of Equalization v. AMALGAMATED SUGAR COMPANY, LLC

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2006No. 31063PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a district court order concerning the assessed valuation of industrial property owned by appellant The Amalgamated Sugar Company, LLC (Amalgamated, or subsequently known as TASCO) as calculated by respondents Canyon County Board of Equalization and Twin Falls County Board of Equalization (Counties). After conducting a trial de novo, the district court reversed the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (BTA) and adopted the Counties’ assessed valuation of TASCO’s property. We uphold the decision of the district court, but we remand the matter for a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Urrutia v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Friends of Farm to Market v. Valley CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gilbert v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Senator, Inc. v. Ada County, Board of EqualizationIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Ada County Board of Equalization v. Highlands, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Eby v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Dawson v. CHEYOVICH FAMILY TRUSTIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Idaho Youth Ranch, Inc. v. Ada County Board of EqualizationIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Boise Mode, LLC v. Donahoe Pace & Partners Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Kimbrough v. Idaho Board of Tax AppealsIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API