Legal Opinion

Hall v. Smith

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 25, 1933PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The plaintiff was injured in consequence of what, it is admitted, could be found to be negligent operation by the defendant of an automobile in which both were *167riding. The accident happened on Sunday, May 1, 1927. The plaintiff was riding in the automobile while travelling to obtain a tool which he needed to use in performing a task which the defendant had on that day hired him to perform. They were on their way to the place of performance. The task could be found to be neither an act of charity nor of necessity. No allegation of gross negligence was made in the declaration.

The case is before…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Commonwealth v. McNaryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Lyttle v. MontoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Meeney v. DoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Labatte v. LavalleeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Perry v. HanoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Comfort Air Systems, Inc. v. CacopardoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Haney v. TakakuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Taylor v. GoldsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  5. Sutherland v. McGeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API