Legal Opinion

Toomer v. Warren

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 17, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Injunction and receiver. Before Judge Martin. Pulaski superior court. April 7, 1905.

1Opinion of the CourtPish, P. J.

1. The material facts of this case being substantially the same as those involved in Bell v. Dawson Grocery Company, 120 Ga. 628, the , rulings there made are controlling in the present case.

2. It is only where discovery is expressly prayed for in plaintiff’s petition that two witnesses, or one witness and corroborating circumstances, are required to rebut the answer of defendant, as to facts within his own knowledge, responsive to the discovery sought. Civil Code, § 3950; Acts 1898, p. 53.

3. A judgment overruling a demurrer to a petition for injunction and receiver, rendered upon an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bell v. Dawson Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Reynolds & Hamby Estate Mortgage Co. v. KingsberySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carlton v. Moultrie Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Arnold v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API