Legal Opinion

Carlton v. Moultrie Banking Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 22, 1930No. 7284PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) One of the grounds of the. motion for new trial in this case assigns error because the court directed the verdict. The determination of this issue depends primarily upon two questions: first, whether the note sued upon by the plaintiff and the deed executed by the defendant to secure the payment of that note constitutes an entire contract; and second, whether the relation of Kline as attorney for the bank was such that his knowledge may be imputed to the bank and that the bank is bound by his conduct in obtaining the note and security deed involved in this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Broxton v. NelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Pierce v. Middle Georgia Land & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Branch, Sons & Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  4. Mays v. FletcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Gross v. WhitelySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Grant Thornton LLP v. Prospect High Income FundTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Deen v. Baxley State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Lane v. OustaletMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Magid v. BeaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Capricorn Systems, Inc. v. PednekarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API