Legal Opinion
United States v. Garfinkle
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 22, 2001No. 00-4156PublishedCited by 311 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
Paul Garfinkle appeals from the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in this case and dismissing appellant’s petition to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 1 Our jurisdiction over this appeal arises from 28 U.S.C. § 2253(a). “We review the district court’s legal rulings on a § 2255 motion de novo and its findings of fact for dear error.” United States v. Kennedy, 225 F.3d 1187, 1193 (10th Cir.2000) (further quotation omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1406, 149 L.Ed.2d 348 (2001).
Appellant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ray MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Robert Ray Mhoon, Takura Fujiwara, and Melinda Isabel FujiwaraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by311 opinions
- Griffin v. BryantDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- United States v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Valdez v. TerryDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Lucero v. OrtizDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Heard v. ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.