Sobrado v. State
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1DissentCarlton, J.
¶29. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion. I would affirm the circuit court’s decision in this case. The original sentencing order required Sobrado to attend the restitution center to complete restitution as a term and condition prior to receiving his suspended sentence and post-release supervision (PRS). See Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-34 (Rev.2011) (defendant shall abide by the terms and conditions as the court may establish). Under Mississippi Code Annotated section 47-7-37 (Rev.2011), the sentencing judge possessed the authority and discretion to revoke So-brado’s suspended…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Riely v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Bell v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Presley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
- Siggers v. EppsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.