Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sobrado v. State

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided February 18, 2014No. 2012-CP-00484-COAPublished

1DissentCarlton, J.

¶29. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion. I would affirm the circuit court’s decision in this case. The original sentencing order required Sobrado to attend the restitution center to complete restitution as a term and condition prior to receiving his suspended sentence and post-release supervision (PRS). See Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-34 (Rev.2011) (defendant shall abide by the terms and conditions as the court may establish). Under Mississippi Code Annotated section 47-7-37 (Rev.2011), the sentencing judge possessed the authority and discretion to revoke So-brado’s suspended…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Riely v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bell v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Presley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Siggers v. EppsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API