Legal Opinion

Stone v. Howe

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 4, 1943No. 3411PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

I. The claim that evidence of the Vermont law could not be received without specific declaration of that law is not in accordance with our practice. The declaration in tort of facts occurring in New Hampshire assumes that the local law is controlling, even though it be not pleaded. When the declaration shows that the plaintiff seeks to recover for negligence in Vermont, with consequent damages there, the applicability of Vermont law follows as a matter of course. If the law of Vermont is here ascertained in part by evidence, it is also true that we take judicial notice of it. Saloshin v.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cross v. Passumpsic Fibre Leather Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  2. Marshal v. Dalton Paper MillsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  3. Vaillancourt v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  4. McDuffee's Admx. v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
  5. Carleton v. E. & T. Fairbanks & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boucher v. BoucherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  2. Heath v. JoyceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API