Legal Opinion
Gigante v. Target, Inc.
Richmond County Circuit Court
Decided April 13, 2000No. Case No. LF-1883-3Published
1Opinion of the Court
BY JUDGE T. J. MARROW
The parties appeared on Defendants Target, Inc.’s, and Brett E. Fields’ Demurrer to Amended Motion for Judgment (AMJ) and a memorandum in support was received and argument was heard.
Upon demurrer, the court accepts all properly pleaded material facts as true. They are those expressly alleged, those impliedly alleged, and those reasonably inferred from the facts alleged. See CaterCorp, Inc. v. Catering Concepts, Inc., 246 Va. 22 (1993).
This case arises from termination of the contractual relationship between C. W. Gigante & Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation licensed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- CaterCorp, Inc. v. Catering Concepts, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1993
- Chaves v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Gazette, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Duggin v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.