Legal Opinion

Robert Mitzel v. Arthur Tate, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 5, 2001No. 99-3992PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Appellant Robert Mitzel (“Mitzel” or “petitioner”) appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We granted a certificate of appealability (“COA”) with respect to three issues:

1) whether the trial court improperly admitted into evidence statements made by Mitzel to police;

2) whether the trial court improperly failed to give a jury instruction on aiding and abetting a suicide; and

3) whether Mitzel’s trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by not requesting a jury instruction on aiding and abetting suicide.

We now…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Maurice A. Mason v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Joel Dufresne v. Carmen PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. Clarence Carter v. Betty Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. Haliym v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. Kumal Burton v. Paul Renico, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API