Legal Opinion
Ronnie Maurice Howard v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 25, 2004No. 03-11919PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARNES, Circuit Judge:
Ronnie Maurice Howard appeals from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion as time-barred. The district court concluded that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Alabama v. Shelton, 535 U.S. 654, 122 S.Ct. 1764, 152 L.Ed.2d 888 (2002), did not recognize a “new” right and therefore did not restart the running of the one-year period of limitation under § 2255 ¶ 6(3). The district court’s conclusion is not an unreasonable one, but we are obligated to exercise de novo review, Castro v. United States, 290 F.3d 1270, 1272 (11th Cir.2002), and doing so we reach the opposite…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Joshua Daniel Bishop v. Warden, GDCPCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Dudley Bryant, Jr. v. Warden, FCC Coleman - MediumCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Carlos Granda v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. LallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Isaac Seabrooks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.