Legal Opinion

Waslien v. City of Hillsboro

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1922PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1116 Statement.

Bronson, J.

This is an injunction proceeding involving the constitutionality of an annexation statute. In 1920 the defendant city, pursuant to chap. 68, Laws of 1915, annexed certain adjacent territory, within the terms of the statute. This was done against the protest of certain property owners in the territory annexed, and after a hearing before the defendant city commissioners. No appeal was taken to the Annexation Review Commission. The plaintiffs are residents of the territory annexed. The defendants are an incorporated city, operating under the commission form, and its city…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. McClain v. LockeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  2. State ex rel. Linde v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Moers v. City of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  4. Vermont Loan & Trust Co. v. WhithedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Martin v. TylerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Minot v. GronnaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Village of North Fargo v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. City of Fargo v. Annexation Review Commission of Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. City of Fargo v. Annexation Review Commission of Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Murphy v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API