Legal Opinion

Murphy v. City of Bismarck

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1961No. 7941PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A. J. GRONNA, District Judge.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs, abutting property owners, from thp judgment in favor of the City of Bismarck in a civil action in the district court of Burleigh County, the Honorable H. E. Rittgers, District Judge, presiding. Plaintiffs demand a trial de novo. Such judgment determines and adjudges:(1) That Street Improvement District No. 60 was legally and properly created in March 1960 by Ordinance No. 1358, enacted by the board of city commissioners of Bismarck to widen, pave, and otherwise improve an interconnecting network of streets and avenues lying…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Lang v. City of CavalierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Webster v. FargoSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. State Ex Rel. Minot v. GronnaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Detroit v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Soo Line Railroad Company v. City of WiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Parker Hotel Company v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Cloverdale Foods Co. v. City of MandanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Dakota Land Company v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Fisher v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API