Legal Opinion
Hampton v. Davenport
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided October 16, 2002No. 24867PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. PARRISH, Judge.
T.H.E. Insurance Co., a garnishee defendant, (the garnishee) filed a notice of appeal directed to a Circuit Court order denying its motion to quash a garnish ment. 1 The appeal is dismissed.
Rule 84.04 mandates what an appellant’s brief shall contain. “Violations of Rule 84.04 are grounds for a court to dismiss an appeal.” Shochet v. Allen, 987 S.W.2d 516, 518 (Mo.App.1999). Whether an appeal will be dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 84.04 is discretionary. Keeney v. Missouri Highway & Transp. Com’n, 70 S.W.3d 597, 598 n. 1 (Mo.App.2002). “That discretion is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Wilkerson v. PrelutskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Shochet v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Sutton v. GoldenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Kline v. Casey's General Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Daniel v. Indiana Mills & Manufacturing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Bowers v. Hiland Dairy Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Environmental Energy Partners, Inc. v. Siemens Building Technologies, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Thompson v. Flagstar Bank, FSBMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. McDanielMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.