Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Hardy

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from' circuit court, Kingsbury county; Horn. Julian Bennett, Judge. Action by D. A Thompson and wife-- against. Rufus 1». Hardy and wife. From' a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, P. J.

This is an action by the plaintiffs., as; bus-band and wife, to rescind a conveyance of real estate' made by them to the- defendant. Rufus L. Hardy in March, 190/11.. A jury was impaneled to try special issues, and returned special verdicts;, which were,' in substance, adopted by the court as a part of bis findings ' of fact; and, such, findings and conclusions, of law being in favor of the plaintiffs, the- defendants have appealed.

It is disclosed by the- record in this- case that in. the fall of 1900 the plaintiff D. A. Thompson was-the. owner of a section of land in Kingsbury county, upon…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gould v. . Cayuga County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Simar v. . CanadayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Vail v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Allerton v. . AllertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Kelley v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Donovan v. DicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Ganow v. AshtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Conklin v. ThorsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API