Barten v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Bryan Barten, No. CV-23-00267-TUC-CKJ (MSA) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Bryan Barten’s motion to compel discovery. 16 (Doc. 58.) The motion has been fully briefed. (Docs. 64, 72.) Oral argument was requested 17 but is not deemed necessary. For the following reasons, the motion will be granted in part. 18 Background1 19 In April 1995, Plaintiff was rendered a quadriplegic as a result of an automobile 20…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Richard Davis v. Robert H. FendlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Zilisch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Johnson v. Kraft Foods North America, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Ramirez v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.