Legal Opinion

Schuhmacher Co. v. Bahn

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 19, 1934No. 8023PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

Appellee, G. A. Bahn, sued appellant, the Schuhmacher Company, for damages resulting from the collision of its truck with his automobile, at the intersection of Seventh and *206Comal streets, in Austin. Appellee was driving his automobile in a westerly' direction on Seventh street, and the agent of appellant was driving i'ts truck in a northerly direction on Comal street when the truck ran into the automobile, striking “the middle of the car” on the left side. Appellee alleged and the jury found that the truck driver was guilty of negligence which proximately caused the collision…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International-Great Northern R. v. CaseyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Ward v. CatheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Bartley v. MarinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. DukesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lewis v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Intges v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Norris Bros., Inc. v. MattinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Stovall v. WhatleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Buchanan v. LangCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API