State ex rel. Burns v. Fornea
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentTate, Judge
I must respectfully dissent.
The majority opinion well and fairly summarizes the evidence in the record. The circumstances giving rise to this removal action are certainly such as justifiably arouse suspicion. Because the explanation of these circumstances may seem ambiguous or improbable, however, it is not necessarily false. The. District Court and the jury had the, opportunity to see and hear the witnesses, and the jurymen unanimously held the evidence did not prove the misdemeanor charged, and the District Court adopted this verdict as the judgment appealed from.
It may well be that knowing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stanley v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Stanley v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- State ex rel. Shreveport Cotton Oil Co. v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Selser v. RevolSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Norman v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.