Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 1, 2009No. 09 CR. 415(VM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

Curtis Taylor (“Taylor”) is charged by indictment with possession of a controlled substance by fraud or forgery and, with two co-defendants, Hobbs Act robbery, conspiracy to commit Hobbs Acts robbery, and using a weapon during a crime of violence.

On September 11, 2009, Taylor filed five motions relating to these charges. The first two ask this Court to order the Government to immediately disclose all Brady material and evidence of prior bad acts that the Government intends to introduce at trial. The third motion seeks to suppress…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. FernandesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
  2. United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API