Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 1, 2010No. 09 Cr. 0415 (VM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.

Defendants Curtis Taylor (“Taylor”), Samuel Vasquez, a/k/a “Rock” (“Vasquez”), and Antonio Rosario (“Rosario”) are charged by indictment (the “Indictment”) with conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951, Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951 and 2, and using a weapon during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1)(A)(ii) and 2. Taylor is also charged with possession of a controlled substance by fraud and forgery, and aiding and abetting the same, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BumaginDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  2. Maddox v. FrancemoneDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API