Legal Opinion

Pomante v. Marathon Ashland Pipe Line L.L.C.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 2010No. 08AP-653PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Connor, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Karen Pomante and others, the owners of 15 parcels of land, appeal the decision of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment to defendant-appellee, Marathon Ashland Pipe Line, L.L.C. For the following reasons, we reverse the decision granting summary judgment.

{¶ 2} This appeal regards a dispute over an easement to operate and maintain a pipeline. In 1944, the easement was granted to Sinclair Refining Company, before it was later assigned to appellee. The subdivision containing appellants’ properties was platted in 1949.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State ex rel. Grady v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Coventry Township v. EckerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Mergenthal v. Star Banc Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tower 10, L.L.C. v. 10 W. Broad Owner, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Columbia Gas v. BaileyOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. Dalliance Real Estate, Inc. v. CovertOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Prince v. HarperOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Strahm v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co., L.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API