Pierre v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant City of New York appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated April 28, 2004, as denied its motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it on the ground, inter alia, that the plaintiffs Maude Pierre and Kerby Pierre failed to timely serve a notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e, and deemed so much of the notice of claim as was asserted on behalf of the plaintiff Kerby Pierre timely served nunc pro tunc.
Ordered that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Small v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Perry v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Santiago v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Carr v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fried v. Jacob Holding, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Varricchio v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Browne v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Pearson v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Ellman v. Village of RhinebeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.