Callis, Papa, Jackstadt & Halloran, P.C. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
Illinois Supreme Court
1Concurrence
JUSTICE KILBRIDE,
specially concurring:
I concur with the majority’s decision that the parties to the collective-bargaining agreement explicitly waived the presence of attorneys at disciplinary hearings. Nevertheless, I submit this concurrence to underscore three points. First, I believe that our decision should be based upon our longstanding respect for collective-bargaining agreements. Second, we should note that this decision is limited to the facts in this particular case and that a different factual scenario may well present a sufficient claim to invoke the public policy exception to our…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, District 17Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Department of Central Management ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. StateIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Leoris v. DicksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.