Legal Opinion

Bloom v. Muckenthaler

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 12, 2005No. 93,574PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Buser, J:

Steven Kent Bloom, an inmate at the Lansing Correctional Facility, brought this pro se civil rights action under K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 60-1501 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). Bloom appeals the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with directions.

Factual and Procedural Background

Bloom filed a civil rights lawsuit pursuant to K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 60-1501 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Kansas Department of Corrections and various named and unnamed employees (KDOC). On October 5, 2004, the district court considered KDOC’s answer…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Davis v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. Currier v. DoranCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Astorga v. Leavenworth County SheriffCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API