Legal Opinion

State v. Greever

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 5, 1994No. 70,383PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brazil, J.:

Steven F. Greever was convicted of forgery pursuant to K.S.A. 21-3710(a)(2), and the trial court enhanced his sentence under K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4504(c). He appeals, contending that the court erred by enhancing his sentence under 21-4504(c) and by not reciting the specific findings upon which the enhanced sentence was based and that K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4504 is unconstitutionally vague. We vacate the sentence and remand with directions.

Appellate courts will not disturb a sentence imposed by a trial court on grounds that it is excessive “ ‘provided it is within the limits…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. KirbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  2. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  4. State v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. State v. CippolaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  2. State v. MaggardCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
  3. State v. LackeySupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. State v. KimseyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  5. Student Loan Marketing Ass'n ex rel. Servicing Agent, Sallie Mae Servicing, L.P. v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API