Legal Opinion
In re Feit
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to the Bar by this court in 1966. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Albany.
The sole charge of misconduct contained in the petition commencing this disciplinary proceeding is that respondent has failed to cooperate with petitioner in its investigation of inquiries concerning him. After respondent answered the petition, petitioner moved pursuant to section 806.5 of this court’s rules (22 NYCRR 806.5) for an order declaring that no factual issues were presented and fixing a time at which respondent could be heard in mitigation or otherwise. By…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re KoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re SpiegelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re LynchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re FarleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re AdangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re BrennerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re FeitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re CrumbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008