In re Feit

Per Curiam. Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1966. He maintains an office for the practice of law in Albany.

Respondent has not answered or replied or otherwise appeared in opposition to a petition of four charges of professional misconduct dated February 2, 1995, or to petitioner’s subsequent default judgment motion, made returnable April 10, 1995, though both the petition and motion were personally served on him. In support of its motion, petitioner has filed proof of service of the petition and motion and proof by affidavit of the facts constituting the alleged…