Legal Opinion

People v. Caballero

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 2008No. 104216 RelPublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Karmeier

Justices Fitzgerald, Kilbride, and Garman concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Chief Justice Thomas dissented, with opinion, joined by Justices Freeman and Burke.

OPINION

The issues presented by this appeal are: (1) whether a reviewing court may grant the per diem monetary credit conferred by section 110 — 14 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (725 ILCS 5/110 — 14 (West 2002)) to a defendant who first applies for it on appeal from the dismissal of his postconviction petition; and (2) whether a defendant may receive the per diem monetary credit conferred by section 110 — 14 for the time…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. WoodardIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. PendletonIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  5. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. People v. LucasIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. LongAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. People v. MaldonadoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. People v. LattimoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API