Legal Opinion

State Ex Inf. Ashcroft Ex Rel. Bell v. City of Fulton

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 3, 1982No. 63940PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Judge.

Relator filed this action in quo warranto claiming amendments six and seven to article VI, section 27 of the Missouri Constitution providing for formation of the Joint Municipal Utility Commission never became part of the constitution and that respondents should be ousted of all rights, power and authority they claim under section 27 as amended. The court granted summary judgment in favor of respondents. Relator charges the trial court erred in its holding that both amendments had become part of the Missouri Constitution; and that the Governor had authority to proclaim the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. KrausSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. Boone County Court v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. Gabbert v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. State Ex Rel. Hewlett v. WomachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  5. State Ex Rel. Board of Fund Commissioners v. HolmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. StopAquila. Org v. City of PeculiarSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  3. Tax Increment Financing Commission of Kansas City v. J.E. Dunn Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. STATE EX INF. NESSLAGE v. City of Lake St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Barnes v. BaileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API