Commonwealth v. Grundza
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtGraci, J.
¶ 1 Appellant, Eric Lee Grundza (hereinafter “Grundza”), seeks relief from a judgment of sentence imposed following a bench trial. For the reasons that follow, we remand.
I.PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Following a search of Grundza’s vehicle in which marijuana and ecstasy were found, Grundza was charged with Possession with Intent to Deliver Marijuana, 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(30), and Possession with Intent to Deliver Ecstasy, 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(30). Grundza filed a Motion to Suppress. Testimony was taken and the motion was denied on November 6, 2001. On the same date, Grundza was convicted of two…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. PittsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
3Cited by31 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. PageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. LandisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. NealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.