Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Grundza

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 2003PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraci, J.

¶ 1 Appellant, Eric Lee Grundza (hereinafter “Grundza”), seeks relief from a judgment of sentence imposed following a bench trial. For the reasons that follow, we remand.

I.PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Following a search of Grundza’s vehicle in which marijuana and ecstasy were found, Grundza was charged with Possession with Intent to Deliver Marijuana, 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(30), and Possession with Intent to Deliver Ecstasy, 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(30). Grundza filed a Motion to Suppress. Testimony was taken and the motion was denied on November 6, 2001. On the same date, Grundza was convicted of two…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. PittsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. PageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. LandisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. NealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API