Legal Opinion

United Steelworkers v. Doyle

Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas

Decided July 1, 1958No. 153206PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*394OPINION

By MAIDEN, Jr., J.

No formal opinion having been rendered upon the action of the court overruling the motions to quash service and overruling the demurrers, counsel are entitled to a discussion of the applicable law and the reasons for the rulings. This is also in point upon the plea of lack of jurisdiction set up in the answers of the Administrator and the Deputies.

Sec. 2307.35 R. C., reads in part as follows:

*395“Actions for the following causes must be brought in the county where the cause of action or part thereof arose;
“(B) Against a public officer, for an act done by him in virtue or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States Ex Rel. Sherman v. Carter Constr. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. American Life & Accident Ins. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Meeker v. ScudderOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Riegel v. State Ex Rel. WeaverOhio Court of Appeals · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Neal v. Reliance Electric & Engineering Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API