Legal Opinion

State Auto Insurance Companies v. McClamroch

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1998No. COA97-879PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

We first consider whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because plaintiff is not the correct party plaintiff. Defendants argue that “State Auto Insurance Companies” is not the proper plaintiff because the insurance policy being reviewed was issued by “State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company,” a separate legal entity. Accordingly, defendants argue that plaintiff has not carried its burden of proving that it had standing to sue.

Plaintiff first contends that defendants failed to raise this matter in the trial court and cannot raise it for the first time on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Waste Management of Carolinas, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Calloway v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Grant v. Emmco InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. StoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Henderson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Northland Casualty Co. v. HBE Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
  2. Kubit v. MAG Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Russell v. Cincinnati Insurance (In re Russell)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2001
  4. Nautilus Insurance Company v. Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API