Legal Opinion
FICI v. Lucent Technologies Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 10, 2008No. 1:02-cv-10536PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
YOUNG, District Judge.
Order entered approving Report and Recommendations. Summary Judgment allowed. Judgment shall enter for the defendants.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR DISMISSAL (Docket # 173)
ALEXANDER, United States Magistrate Judge.
On March 22, 2002, Plaintiffs Paul Fici and Anthony P. Boremi (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) sued their former employer, Lucent Technologies Inc. (“Lucent”) 1 , for breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA 2 §§ 502(a)(1)(B) 3 & (a)(3) 4 . Plaintiffs contend that Lucent breached its fiduciary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Norman W. OLIVER, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Donald F. Bogue v. Ampex Corporation and Allied-Signal, Inc. Does 1-10, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Arivella v. Alcatel-LucentDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010