Legal Opinion

United States v. Steele

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 9, 2013No. Docket 12-1072-crPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

If a criminal defendant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) that is subsequently amended by the Sentencing Commission, a federal sentencing court may, in some circumstances, reduce the defendant’s term of imprisonment based on the amended Guidelines provision. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The question presented in this appeal is whether a sentencing court exercising this authority may give a defendant the additional benefit of a downward departure previously awarded in the original sentencing. We hold that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. RegaladoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Padilla AlvaradoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Glenn FlemmingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  5. Alli-Balogun v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API