Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Sharp

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 14, 1994No. 94-02453PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The petitioner, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, invokes our cer-tiorari jurisdiction to review portions of a discovery order compelling production of certain documents. We have jurisdiction. See, e.g., Richardson v. Watson, 611 So.2d 1254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

We grant the writ in part and quash that aspect of the order requiring production of medical reports, with patient names deleted, prepared by Dr. Michael Slomka for the petitioner and a non-party (State Farm Fire and Casualty Company) concerning persons other than the respondent. In doing so, we specifically adopt the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crandall v. MichaudDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Richardson v. WatsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Allstate Van Lines Corp. v. PalmerioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. HarrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API