Legal Opinion

Crandall v. Michaud

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 5, 1992No. 92-0788PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

603 So.2d 637 (1992)

Irene Weloy CRANDALL and Jack W. Barrett, M.D., Petitioners,

v.

Barbara MICHAUD and John Michaud, her husband, Respondents.

No. 92-0788.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

August 5, 1992.

Michele I. Nelson of Paxton, Crow, Bragg, Smith & Keyser, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Blake & Torres, Fort Pierce, for petitioners.

Jeffrey F. Mahl and Maureen M. Matheson of Reinman, Harrell, Graham, Mitchell & Wattwood, P.A., Melbourne, for respondents.

2Per curiam

Petitioners seeking certiorari are Irene W. Crandall, a defendant in the suit below, and Jack W. Barrett, M.D., a defense…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. South Florida Blood ServiceSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Argonaut Ins. Co. v. PeraltaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. No. Miami Gen. Hosp. v. Royal Palm Beach ColonyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Ventimiglia Ex Rel. Ventimiglia v. MoffittDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NY v. LopezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. Elkins v. SykenSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Syken v. ElkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. LeJeune v. AikinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Young v. SantosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Graham v. DacheikhDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API