Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Gallagher
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 29, 1953No. Appeals, Nos. 163 and 164PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
This assumpsit action was brought by the plaintiff carrier to recover freight and demurrage charges upon a railroad shipment of two motor trucks. The appeal is from the action of the court below holding the answer of defendants insufficient as a matter of law and entering judgment for plaintiff. E. A. Gallagher and Sons were the shippers and the action was instituted against the personal representatives of Edward A. *464Gallagher, a deceased partner, and Arthur A. Gallagher, the surviving partner, as individuals and partners. Both defendants have separately appealed.
The trucks,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Illinois Steel Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Griggs v. . York-Shipley, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Clinchfield Fuel Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1951
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. RothsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McCARTHY v. RECORDEX SERVICE, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Freight Operations, Inc. v. Hunterdon County Democrat, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- McCarthy v. Recordex Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996