Riverside Cnty. Dep't of Pub. Soc. Servs. v. D.H. (In re D.H.)
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtSlough, J.
*722"Principles of due process require that the juvenile court not terminate a presumed father's parental rights without first finding, by clear and convincing evidence, that the father is unfit." ( In re G.S.R. (2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 1202, 1205, 72 Cal.Rptr.3d 398 ( G.S.R. ).) In this dependency appeal, D.H., Sr. (father), the presumed father of D.H., argues the juvenile court violated due process by terminating his parental rights without making an unfitness or detriment finding against him by clear and convincing evidence at any point in the proceedings.
Beginning with In re Gladys L. (2006)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cynthia D. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Guardianship of Ann S.California Supreme Court · 2009
- Riverside County Department of Public Social Services v. A.B.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Alameda County Social Services Agency v. T.B.California Court of Appeal · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re A.C. CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2021
- In re B.S. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re D.L. CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021
- In re J.H. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021