Legal Opinion

Newman v. Kendall

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 5, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is an action of tort for fraud in the exchange of real estate. There was trial by jury and a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted.

The parties exchanged properties, and in the exchange the plaintiff received from the defendant a pasture and timber lot at the price of $5,000. About one hundred and fifty acres of the lot was pasture and about one hundred acres was timber land.

The plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that, as an inducement to him to take the lot at $5,000, the defendant represented and guaranteed to him that there were 400,000 feet of old growth merchantable…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Slack v. BraggSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
  2. Hunt v. LewisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  3. Arnold v. SomersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  4. Niles v. DanforthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  5. Caldbeck v. SimantonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allard v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  2. Bradbury v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Smith v. BadlamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  4. Sexton v. NeunSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  5. Cunningham v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API