Legal Opinion
Shehata v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 20, 2015No. 2013-10599PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Cablevision, Cablevision Systems of New York City Corporation, and CSC Holdings, Inc., appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated September 30, 2013, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them, and the defendants Palm Beach Home for Adults, LLC, and 2900 Bragg Street, LLC, separately appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the same order as denied their motion…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Kellman v. 45 Tiemann Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Bloomfield v. Jericho Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Bravo v. 564 Seneca Avenue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nyack v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Paraskevopoulos v. Voun Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Fajardo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Stepkowski v. Holy Trinity Diocesan High Sch.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019