Legal Opinion
Marable v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided March 26, 1999No. 06-98-00126-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice GRANT.
William R. Marable appeals his conviction for delivery of a controlled substance, cocaine of less than one gram. Marable was charged by indictment 1 for actual delivery of a controlled substance and pleaded not guilty. A jury found Marable guilty, and the trial court sentenced him to twenty months in the State Jail Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.
Marable contends he did not receive sufficient notice of the theory of culpability under which the State would seek conviction for delivery of a controlled substance and the evidence was legally and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Duron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Marable v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Cantrell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
- Miles v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Cantrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Cantrell, Franklin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.