Legal Opinion

Cantrell v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided April 30, 2002No. 06-00-00014-CRPublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice CORNELIUS.

In our opinion dated May 22, 2001, we affirmed Franklin Cantrell’s conviction for theft of fiduciary property. On review, the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed our judgment and remanded the case for us to address Cantrell’s legal sufficiency argument set out in his point five. We did address legal sufficiency in our original opinion and found the evidence legally sufficient to support the conviction. We did not specifically address Cantrell’s fifth point, which contended the evidence is legally insufficient to prove that the stolen money was owned by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Cartwright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Drilling v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
  2. Miller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2011
  3. Ledet v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  4. Ex Parte Franklin Cantrell, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2003
  5. Don Martin O'Neal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API