Cullerton v. Mead
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Twelfth Judicial District. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCrocker, J.
The complaint in this case avers that on the twenty-ninth day of September, 1856, the plaintiff recovered a judgment against Phillips, since deceased, which is still unsatisfied; that after the death of Phillips the defendant was appointed administrator of his estate; that on the twelfth day of January, 1860, the administrator caused a notice to be published requiring creditors or persons having claims against the estate to present them to him within ten months from the date of the notice; that the order for publication required it to be made once a week for five weeks; that on the thirteenth…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- White v. Steam-Tug Mary AnnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- Burnham v. HaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
3Cited by11 opinions
- Warner Bros. Pictures v. BrodelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- In re MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- McClearen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Sterling v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.