Legal Opinion
Universal Winding Co. v. Foster Mach. Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 1, 1936No. 4127PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
McLELLAN, District Judge.
This is a suit for infringement of two patents, one granted to Franklin A. Reece on March 4, 1930, No. 1,749,355, for a traversing means for winding machines, and another to Swanson and Marcroft of February 13, 1934, No. 1,946,506, for a winding machine. The plaintiff is the assignee of both patents. The defense to each is invalidity and noninfringement.
Statements of fact in this opinion may be taken as findings of fact, and conclusions of law as rulings of law, in accordance with the equity rules.
Both patents in suit relate to winding machines, the object of which is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Knapp v. MorssSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. MedartSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Champagne v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985